Archive for the 'Prevention' Category

Conspiracy Theorists and Flu Vaccines – Pick Another Battle Please

A couple of weeks ago I posted a flu vaccine commentary and poll after listening to Dr. Dean Edell on the radio. He was talking about people who refuse to get vaccinated. He made the comment that vaccines have been proven effective for decades, and he’s tired of trying to defend them. That if people refuse to get vaccinated, and die — well — that’s just a way to clean out the gene pool.

Readers of the post took offense, calling me arrogant and ignorant. Among them are people who are truly afraid, people who are allergic, people who feel as if they have done their due diligence and have dismissed vaccines (empowered patients!) — and conspiracy theorists.

I wrote a follow up post, citing highly credible sources for all to see, showing why I believe flu vaccines are so important. The bottom line is that the flu is dangerous — both the H1N1 swine flu and the seasonal flu are killers. Vaccines are the only defense we have today (who knows – maybe we’ll have something better in the future?) And the statistics tell us that we have a 591% better chance of dying from the flu than we do dying from the flu vaccine. You don’t have to be a Las Vegas gambler to understand those odds.

I am actually VERY pleased that so many people have given researched thought and consideration to the question – even the ones who disagree with me.  However — I must say — I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with the flu vaccine conspiracy theorists…. seriously. And if you are one, I say to you — get a life!

Here are the conspiracy theorists’ arguments. They remind me of a saying I heard many years ago — “Just because I’m paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get me.”  Further – they have violated the first rule of questionable healthcare practices, and that is – Follow the Money.

Here are some of their lines of reasoning, and my comments:

1. Flu vaccine is only produced to make pharmaceutical companies richer. To that I say — don’t be silly. For the cost, personnel and too tiny profits to be made by producing vaccine, pharmaceutical manufacturers would much prefer to put their efforts into producing something that actually makes a worthwhile profit for them.  Included is the manufacturing are symptoms relievers — far FAR more profitable in the long run.  Why would they want to prevent an illness at very little profit at the expense of bigger profits from medicine that could relieve or fix us?

2.  Flu vaccines were developed from African Green Monkeys - and the real intent is to eradicate the population of the earth! This one gets the “give me a break” award on so many counts… First…  if the government wanted to eradicate the entire population of the earth, they could do it FAR more efficiently by using, oh, say  anthrax or dengue fever – or some other killer.  Why would they go to all the trouble to develop something that actually took science?  Why not a shortcut, and something cheap to do it?

3.  And then I have to ask – why would the government (which government anyway?) want to eradicate the world’s population? If the government eradicated the world’s population, then who would be left to govern?  and who would be left to pay taxes to that government?  and who would be in charge anyway?  (because the government is comprised of people who would get sick, too)…. etc etc….

Sorry — but these theories are just plain laughable.  You want a conspiracy?  I think there’s a conspiracy to make me waste my time looking these things up — because I do my due diligence, unlike some of my readers.

Here’s the deal — I understand that not everyone wants to be injected with flu vaccines, and even that some must avoid vaccines because their bodies cannot tolerate them.  However — for the great majority of us (GREAT majority) — flu shots will keep us healthier — and will keep our loved ones and those around us healthier — than not getting flu shots will.

Further — as reasonable people, we need to understand that unless we have a real concern about negative effects of vaccines, we must accept responsibility for passing possibly deadly flu on to others when we don’t get the flu vaccine.  H1N1 or seasonal — they are both killers.  I’m not willing to be responsible for making someone else sick, nor chancing that they could die.  I would not be able to sleep at night.

Do you?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DISCUSS | TIPS | NEWSLETTER | FACEBOOK | TWITTER

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Swine Flu – But What About Bacon and Eggs?

pigs

NoteSwine Flu FAQs updated daily

PlusShould We Be Afraid of Swine Flu?
transparentspacer1

While the professionals provide us with statistics about Mexico, Texas, California or other places where patients have contracted swine flu, I actually find I have different questions all together:

  • I don’t live in Mexico. Am I at risk for getting swine flu?
  • Will my seasonal flu shot protect me?
  • I’ve never met a pig in person and don’t expect I’ll meet one anytime soon. Should I be worried about getting flu from a pig?
  • And what about my favorite Sunday breakfast – bacon and eggs?

So I went in search of the answers, believing that if I have those questions, you might too.  So I put them together in an article along with their answers: Swine Flu FAQs

And as for breakfast?  Very crispy please.

Want more tools and commentary for wise patients?
Sign up for Every Patient’s Advocate email tips
- – - – - – - – - – -
Join Trisha in the Patient Empowerment Forum at About.com
- – - – - – - – - – -
Or link here to empower yourself at EveryPatientsAdvocate.com

Do You Twitter or Facebook Your Way to Better Health?

This is a question being discussed these days through social networking sites — you know, those Facebook and Twitter and MySpace and Plaxo and LinkedIn and Ning and other sites where you can carry on conversations with “virtual” strangers….

So I’m curious.  Have you sought health information through social networking?  Do you Twitter?  or have a page on one of the other sites?

Please take this poll (it will take you, oh, 3 seconds or 4)…

And if you do use social networking for your health, will you share some of your tips so others may do so, too?

Here are some links:

Use Social Networking for Health Information

How to Use Twitter to Find Health Information

Want more tools and commentary for wise patients?
Sign up for Every Patient’s Advocate email tips
- – - – - – - – - – -
Join Trisha in the Patient Empowerment Forum at About.com
- – - – - – - – - – -
Or link here to empower yourself at EveryPatientsAdvocate.com

More Infection Warnings – Tools to Prevent Germy Spread

Betsy McCaughey, director of RID (Reduce Hospital Deaths) reminds us in her latest Wall Street Journal article that those hospital germs, the ones that cause death and debilitation, are everywhere.

In her most recent article, she points to doctors’ and nurses’ scrubs, coats, ties — their clothing.  MRSA, C.Diff. and other infectious pathogens cling to the fabric and get passed from patient to patient.

So — imagine that for a moment — the doctor brushes you with his white coat, that very item that represents his/her MD-dom — and passes an infection on to you which will make you very, very sick, or even kill you.

From Dr. McCaughey’s article:

The problem is that some medical personnel wear the same unlaundered uniforms to work day after day. They start their shift already carrying germs such as C.diff, drug-resistant enterococcus or staphylococcus. Doctors’ lab coats are probably the dirtiest. At the University of Maryland, 65% of medical personnel confess they change their lab coat less than once a week, though they know it’s contaminated. Fifteen percent admit they change it less than once a month. Superbugs such as staph can live on these polyester coats for up to 56 days.

Do unclean uniforms endanger patients? Absolutely. Health-care workers habitually touch their own uniforms. Studies confirm that the more bacteria found on surfaces touched often by doctors and nurses, the higher the risk that these bacteria will be carried to the patient and cause infection.

According to Dr. McCaughey, hospitals used to provide laundered uniforms and scrubs to their personnel, but that practice has gone by the wayside.

So, it seems like it would be a good practice to bring back.  Especially since Medicare is no longer paying for care for patients who acquire infections in the hospital, it seems that laundering that clothing would be far less expensive than having to eat the cost of caring for so many infected patients.

Today’s second warning comes from Bottom Line Health, one of my favorite publications.  I like Bottom Line because it doesn’t accept advertising, and it always brings in multiple points of view, e.g. the best of Eastern and Western medicine and ideas.

This notation comes from Jean-Yves Maillard, PhD from Cardiff University in Wales, UK who tells us that those disinfectant wipes we use on surfaces to kill bacteria (think clorox wipes, or those wipes they put near the shopping carts at supermarkets) may actually just spread those germs around.  We may not be killing those buggers at all!  Dr. Maillard suggests instead that we use one wipe per surface — or one swipe per wipe.

When it comes to these killer germs, we patients just can’t be too careful, can we?

Want more tools and commentary for sharp patients?
Sign up for Every Patient’s Advocate email tips
- – - – - – - – - – -
Join Trisha in the Patient Empowerment Forum at About.com
- – - – - – - – - – -
Or link here to empower yourself at EveryPatientsAdvocate.com