When it comes to TV and video, Al Roker provides one of my favorite quotations:
“They say the camera adds 10 pounds. OK. So I figure I must be standing in front of 10 cameras.”
Oh, yes, Al. I know how you feel….
However — I’ve decided to come out of my video-avoidance closet to share the following with you all.
First — my excitement at the invitation a week ago to appear on MSNBC to speak to a problem that I actually cited a few years ago – that July is the worst month of the year to be hospitalized. Why? Watch and see!
So that’s the first one. But if I’m going to jump in to the world of video, I might as well do it with both feet. Many of you know that I am brought in to speak at various conferences and meetings across the US and Canada. I enjoy speaking! So in my attempts to do even more of it, I’m told I need to have a professional video made. So, yes, I finally bit that bullet, too, and have uploaded the online version of the opening here.
It’s not like I’ve never done TV before – I have done local TV on a number of occasions. And broadcast isn’t the problem – ferheavensake, I have hosted a radio show for 4+ years! But video, in general, has just always been a step I’ve avoided.
In the five years I’ve been working on patient empowerment and patient advocacy, I’ve been thrilled to have been quoted in the likes of the Wall Street Journal, US News & World Report, Forbes, Fox, NPR, PBS and others…
But now I know I have arrived — because O Magazine came calling! Sure enough — an article called Someone on Your Side – it’s about hiring a patient advocate to help you through a medical problem. Because I am the founder of AdvoConnection and work extensively with private patient advocates, I am one of the people quoted in the article.
I join three of my distinguished (and very talented!) colleagues. Hari Khalsa is the Health Whisperer. One of her patient-clients who was being treated for thyroid cancer just could not get her doctors to coordinate her care. Hari stepped in to make sure the care was coordinated and Tracy, the patient, got what she needed.
Gail Gazelle is cited in the article, too. Gail owns a private advocacy business called MDCanHelp. Gail points out that too often doctors just don’t have the time to devote to care coordination as they should. Private patient advocates step in to fill the gap.
And Ken Schueler, who has been coordinating care for cancer patients for many years, is quoted, too. Ken provides some advice for finding good health information online about diseases, clinical trials and more.
The most important information for you? When you read the article, you’ll realize how important it is you find an advocate to help you. Although the Patient Advocate Foundation might work for you if you can’t afford an advocate (they handle insurance and claims issues) — if you need care coordination and help with your medical decisions, then you must give serious consideration to hiring a private patient advocate.
So how do you find these people? Simple: a directory of advocates who have been reviewed for their expertise, and work closely with patients like you everyday: www.AdvoConnection.com.
Private patient advocates provide you with improved health outcomes AND peace of mind.
Update on this post: AdvoConnection is launched! Patients are being helped, and patient advocates are ready to help you. Learn more at: www.AdvoConnection.com.
………………………………………
Hard at work we’ve been! And AdvoConnection, a dream of mine for several years, is getting ready to launch.
Since beginning my advocacy work almost five years ago, and being highly visible on the web, I hear from desperate patients on an almost daily basis:
They cannot get an accurate diagnosis, know they need treatment, and need someone to help them find the doctors, or get the tests, that can help them.
They are seeing too many specialists who aren’t coordinating their care. They need someone who will take a look at their reams of medical records to help them sort out their treatment.
They are having trouble with their insurer, who isn’t paying as promised, or who is denying them care.
They have received doctor or hospital bills that they can’t sort out or decipher. Or they believe they have been billed for services they did not receive. They’ve read that up to 80% of hospital bills are incorrect, and they want someone to help them negotiate with whomever has billed them.
I hear frequently from adult children of elderly parents, perhaps living in a different location, who need assistance for their parents, either to help them find a nursing home, or for eldercare or home health care.
The biggest heartbreakers are the parents who have run into brick walls trying to help their children. Or the left-behind person who lost a loved one to a medical error. They need to know who to turn to — an advocate? a lawyer? to get the support they need.
Now you can see why I wanted to develop AdvoConnection. It is a service for matching patients to the help they need in the form of patient advocates, patient navigators, billing assistance and other forms of medical system assistance that will help them navigate the waters of our dysfunctional health care system.
There are two aspects to this new site and service:
AdvoConnection for Patients – www. AdvoConnection.com – will launch October 1. Patients will be able to search for an advocate or navigator by location and service provided — at no cost to them. They will have the information they need to contact that advocate to inquire more about their services. It’s a directory type service that will help patients and caregivers find the help they need.
Any patient or caregiver who thinks s/he might need patient advocacy assistance can be added to the email list to be alerted when the site goes live (or, if you read this after October 1, 2009, go directly to the site itself.)
AdvoConnection for Advocates – http://members.AdvoConnection.com – provides advocates and navigators will the interface to be a part of the directory for patients described above. It also provides additional business services such as marketing assistance, and a forum for connecting with other advocates. By early 2010, it will also provide them with access to an ask-a-doctor service, and other services they may seek to help them grow their advocacy businesses.
Any patient advocate interested in participating with AdvoConnection may apply for membership through that site: http://members.AdvoConnection.com
I’ll begin this post by saying that I understand the basics — that many parents of children with autism believe that autism was brought on by vaccines. And that scientific research has over and over again proven that link does not exist.
Then I watched the Dateline / Matt Lauer interviews and exposé, A Dose of Controversy, about where that suggestion came from, profiling Andrew Wakefield, the doctor/scientist who first suggested that link existed, and who is now hailed a hero by many of those parents who still believe in the connection. Also interviewed were two more major players in the argument – Brian Deer, a British journalist who has exposed Wakefield over and over again, and Dr. Paul Offit, infectious diseases expert from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who has written a book called Autism’s False Prophets which lambasts Wakefield’s work.
Matt Lauer pulled no punches in his questioning of any of the three. It’s very clear that the worshipping behavior of these parents who believe that somehow Andrew Wakefield represents the second coming is misplaced. But even more than that – it’s very easy to see how we observers must use the follow the money rule on all three of these men. Perhaps an even bigger lesson has to do with LISTENING.
But we also must remember in the midst of this — that many studies (I can’t find a number, but it was suggested there were at least dozens) — studying, literally, MILLIONS of children — have proven every time (not just some, but every time) that an autism-vaccine link DOES NOT EXIST. Even The Lancet, a highly respected medical journal, the one which originally published Andrew Wakefield’s article about that link, has stated that they never would have published it if they had known how Wakefield’s work had been funded (see below.)
Follow the money (FTM) — it’s the rule that helps explain a lot of the “why’s” in healthcare. Here are examples, as applied to the questions about autism:
FTM explains why Andrew Wakefield would continue asserting that the MMR vaccine causes autism — because he is/was paid in at least two ways to make sure that was clear. First, he was paid at least $750,000 by a company that developed a measles-only vaccine that could have been used as a substitute for the MMR. Now, under suspicion for other (unspecified) charges in his native England, he has set up an outpost in Austin, Texas (have to wonder about the wordsmithing there — Austin and Autism) — but is not licensed to practice medicine in the United States. Parents are paying thousands of dollars to have their children tested for certain gastrointestinal problems possibly related to autism, but it was unclear as to whether any children have actually been helped by Wakefield. Further, outside of parents talking about how wonderful he is, none seemed to be able to pinpoint exactly why — except that he listens.
(All other doctors of every stripe — please take heed of that — HE LISTENS.)
Brian Deer – his FTM is a bit easier to track. He is paid to do his investigating and writing, so finding a goldmine like Andrew Wakefield is job security. It should be noted that Deer also needs the money to defend himself legally. He has been sued a number of times by Wakefield — always unsuccessfully — Deer has always prevailed, able to prove that his allegations about Wakefield were accurate and defensible.
Dr. Paul Offit requires some FTM analysis as well. Beyond the income from his book where he alleges that parents have been scammed by Wakefield for more than 10 years, he is full-on supportive of vaccines – including the fact that he is the developer-inventor of one vaccine. So yes, he makes money as the developer of the vaccine, which seems to be unrelated to autism. Interestingly, he has an expense many would not ever think of — he is forced to pay for bodyguards, because some of those Wakefield supporting parents have threatened his life.
Here are some beliefs I hold, which affect my beliefs about this controversy:
I absolutely believe each of these parents who has observed their children well enough to say “She was fine, then she got the vaccine, and something happened.” I don’t question that for a minute, because I do believe parents are THAT WELL tuned in to their children.
I also know human nature well enough to understand why parents cling to any belief that would help them explain something that is otherwise not understandable. As humans, we all want to assign blame. It’s the reason we can’t cope with problems like Hurricane Katrina, or any other mother nature related catastrophe — because there’s really no one to blame. By clinging to the vaccine-as-perpetrator, parents have someone to blame, plus the bonus of a hero in Wakefield. (Plus making Jenny McCarthy a hero — another story for another day.)
When people are desperate, like these parents with autistic children, they will go to extremes, even when those extremes don’t make sense. To so desperately believe in something that has been disproven in so many ways, and to be threatening the life of someone who truly makes sense — these are moves of desperation.
Combining those beliefs, and having done a brief FTM analysis – we have to look at some bigger picture questions, too. I provide no answers here — I’m just sayin’…
So what if Wakefield and all these parents are right? What if the MMR vaccine DOES trigger something that causes autism? Maybe it’s not the vaccine itself — maybe the child happened to have eaten something that day, or has another very mild, asymptomatic virus or bacteria in his body — or ? It could be the vaccine in a combination with something else – I do know a genetic link is being studied, too.
Even if there is a link — how does that change things for the parents whose children do have autism? It doesn’t mean there is a cure. You can’t subtract the vaccine from their bodies. So why would parents put so much energy into their hero-making – at the expense of taking time away from their own children to do it?
Autism is a “spectrum disorder” — is it possible it’s not just one thing? Is it possible that even though the symptoms and some of the behaviors are similar, that these children really have different disorders — triggered by different things? Whose to say that some forms of ADHD, for example, aren’t really a part of that spectrum? I know there are many discussions of misdiagnosis among both autism and ADHD diagnoses….
Finally — I believe the bottom line here is the fact that NONE OF THESE PROFESSIONALS get the fact that the passion and desperation fuel this fire and that the people who feel the most maligned (the parents who believe in Wakefield) do so because they feel that he LISTENS.
And that is the bottom line for today’s very long-winded post. We all need to listen more because listening, then responding appropriately, will lend itself to compromise and understanding — no matter what the controversy.
I’m listening — what can you tell me that will help explain what I don’t understand?
I’ll begin this post by saying that I understand the basics — that many parents of children with autism believe that autism was brought on by vaccines. And that scientific research has over and over again proven that link does not exist.
