<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Strong-Arming the Feds to Allow Sale of Health Information?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trishatorrey.com/2009/01/27/is-google-strong-arming-the-feds-to-allow-sale-of-health-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trishatorrey.com/2009/01/27/is-google-strong-arming-the-feds-to-allow-sale-of-health-information/</link>
	<description>A blog about patient empowerment, advocacy, safety, consumerism and tools to navigate the dysfunction of American health care.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline Salvucci</title>
		<link>http://trishatorrey.com/2009/01/27/is-google-strong-arming-the-feds-to-allow-sale-of-health-information/comment-page-1/#comment-31149</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline Salvucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trishatorrey.com/?p=725#comment-31149</guid>
		<description>Great post! As a retired psychotherapist who practiced within a medical family practice, I certainly agree with you. In fact, when I was practicing, I didn&#039;t take health insurance. I had a sliding fee scale just because of the issue of client privacy. The less info online about one&#039;s health the better, and this certainly includes mental health. Since insurance requires a diagnosis for payment, mental health practitioners use the DSM. Not a good idea for folks who like their privacy! Health records, mental or physical, need to be protected. Online records are definitely risky!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! As a retired psychotherapist who practiced within a medical family practice, I certainly agree with you. In fact, when I was practicing, I didn&#8217;t take health insurance. I had a sliding fee scale just because of the issue of client privacy. The less info online about one&#8217;s health the better, and this certainly includes mental health. Since insurance requires a diagnosis for payment, mental health practitioners use the DSM. Not a good idea for folks who like their privacy! Health records, mental or physical, need to be protected. Online records are definitely risky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

